Rethinking journalist-politician relations in the age of populism: How outsider politicians delegitimize mainstream journalists

 Journalism, vol 22 issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919887822

Autor: Van Dalen, Arjen;  

Keywords: Key words: Journalist-politician relations; political communication culture; delegitimation; legitimacy; mainstream; outsider. 

Abstract: The relation between journalists and politicians in liberal democracy is traditionally conceptualized as highly institutionalized, based on mutual dependence, and grounded in a shared culture of jointly respected role relations. While this conceptualization provides a fruitful framework to understand the relation between mainstream journalists and politicians, it falls short in explaining the way outsider politicians, such as Beppe Grillo, Donald Trump, Thierry Baudet or Nigel Farage address the mainstream media. Thus, this paper rethinks the relation between journalists and politicians in the light of the Western political-media environment in the 2010s, where the rise of authoritarian populism, the fragmentation of media audiences, and the fading boundaries around the journalistic profession have substantially changed media-politics relations. The paper aims to make a theoretical contribution by conceptualizing the relation between outsider politicians and mainstream journalists as an ongoing negotiation over legitimacy. Central in this conceptualization is a classification of five strategies which outsider politicians use to delegitimize mainstream journalists: attacking their character; connecting them with other institutions which are seen as illegitimate; attacking their ethical standards; challenging the claim that journalists work in the public interest; and questioning the beneficial consequences of their work. The consequences of these delegitimation strategies are discussed.  

Idioma: inglés. 

Publicación: 12 de Noviembre del 2019. 

Volumen: Journalism, vol 22 issue 11.

Enlace Permanente